Mandates
-
Aon Benfield v. Vazir
Successfully obtained injunction against former employee who misappropriated company’s copyrighted and proprietary software.
-
Represented a leading Canadian brokerage house in an investigation by the RCMP into whether there insider profits were made with respect to changes to REIT legislation
-
Tervita
Acted for Tervita in successfully challenging a decision by the Commissioner of Competition under s. 92 of the Competition Act to disallow Tervita’s merger with Complete Environmental Inc.
-
Arbitration Seeking Payment of an Earn-out Under a Purchase Agreement
Counsel to the claimants in an arbitration seeking payment of an earn-out under a purchase agreement.
-
Successfully Enforced Right of First Refusal
Successfully represented a partner of a major commercial real estate limited partnership in enforcing a right of first refusal at an arbitration hearing.
-
Counsel to Bechtel Power Corporation in Defence of Proceedings Commenced by Bruce Power Inc
-
R. v. City of Greater Sudbury (City), 2023 SCC 28
Applicability of vicarious liability provisions of Occupational Health and Safety Act to project owners.
-
Akagi v. Synergy Group (2000) Inc., 2015 ONCA 368; 2015 ONCA 771
Successfully represented plaintiffs, Ontario Court of Appeal, reversing worldwide asset freeze, leading authority on investigative receivers, personal liability of court appointed receiver for costs.
-
Lafontaine et al. v. The Government of Manitoba, 2024 MBKB 147
Counsel to a class of children in care in a class action against the Government of Manitoba seeking compensation for Manitoba’s policy of forcibly misappropriating the Children’s Special Allowance.
-
Manulife ats. Mosten
Acting for Manulife in response to an application by Mosten in Saskatchewan for the interpretation of a standard form universal life insurance policy.
-
Aon Reed Stenhouse v. Marsh Canada, 2012 ONSC 7049
Representing Aon in claim against Marsh and two former employees for improperly soliciting clients of Aon’s.
-
Canadian Western Bank v. Alberta (2007), 281 D.L.R. (4th) 125, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2007 SCC 22
Federalism appeal concerning banks’ constitutional challenge to provincial ability to apply market conduct regulation to promotion and distribution of certain types of insurance.