Jonathan Lisus Mandates
-
Canadian Tire v. XL Insurance
Represents Canadian Tire in a claim against a consortium of insurers seeking coverage for business interruption losses suffered by hundreds of retail outlets across Canada related to COVID-19.
-
Counsel to Banque Nationale de Paris in Proceedings Against BCE
-
Counsel to Design, Build, Maintain Consortium of 2.1B P3 Infrastructure Project
-
Counsel to a Leading Land Developer with a Dispute Over a Cost-Sharing Agreement
-
Simon Gillies v. Toronto District School Board, 2015 ONSC 1038
Successfully represented two Toronto high school students in a ground-breaking decision about the use of mandatory breathalyzer tests at high school proms.
-
Arbitration Seeking Relief for Corporate Mismanagement and Other Oppressive Conduct
Counsel to a group of shareholders in an arbitration seeking relief for corporate mismanagement and other oppressive conduct.
-
Environmental Approvals for Two Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects
Counsel to a municipality in connection with environmental approvals for two large-scale infrastructure projects.
-
Dispute Concerning Allegations of Fraud and Misappropriation of Funds Against Former Employee
Represented the plaintiff in a dispute concerning allegations of fraud and misappropriation of funds against a former employee.
-
Case Concerning the Scope of “Reasonable Expectation of Privacy” Under the Voyeurism Provisions in the Criminal Code
Counsel to the Intervener at the Supreme Court of Canada in a case concerning the scope of “reasonable expectation of privacy” under the voyeurism provisions in the Criminal Code.
-
Arbitration Seeking Improved Rates for Service
Successfully represented the claimants in an arbitration seeking improved rates for service.
-
Repeated Motions for Injunctive Relief
Counsel for successful defendant automotive dealer in action involving repeated motions for injunctive relief in the context of the authorization to sell vehicle brands among competing dealers.
-
Blocked a multi-million dollar claim relating to a failed airplane purchase agreement against the Republic of Estonia on the basis of the State Immunity Act