Mandates
-
Represented The Advocates’ Society in the Supreme Court of Canada in the Groia case involving the interpretation of the “Civility Rules” of The Law Society of Ontario
-
2668602 Ontario Inc. v. GWL Realty Advisors Inc., 2024 ONSC 6913
Counsel to a first secured creditor in a high-stakes and fast-moving insolvency of the Bowring Canada and Bombay & Co. home decor stores.
-
Apotex Inc. v. Merck & Co. et al.
Counsel to Merck defending against claims made by Apotex under the PM(NOC) Regulations as well as the Trade-marks Act and a centuries-old English statute, the Statute of Monopolies.
-
Recovery of Insurance Proceeds for Securities Claims
Successfully represented a telecommunications company in obtaining insurance coverage for a series of securities actions claiming billions of dollars in damages.
-
Defending a large North American retailer in a class action brought by purchasers of a deck stain and sealant product
The representative plaintiffs’ seek $50 million in damages on behalf of the class for defects in the product, which was marketed and sold by the retailer.
-
Toronto Hydro-Electric System
Toronto Hydro-Electric System in its 2015-2019 and 2020-2024 electricity distribution rate applications before the Ontario Energy Board (EB-2014-0116)
-
Negotiated a favourable settlement of a partnership dispute and alleged oppression claim on behalf of an individual director and office of a privately held corporation
-
Tancho-Defyrus (GP) Inc. v. Masotti, [2014] O.J. No. 2761, 2014 ONSC 3472
Successfully represented Masotti in claim brought by Tancho-Defyrus for breach of fiduciary duties.
-
Frank v. Legate (2015), 390 D.L.R. (4th) 39, 2015 ONCA 631, affirming 2014 ONSC 4560
Acted for prominent personal injury law firm in striking out multiple claims arising out of publicity surrounding ongoing litigation against physician.
-
Conducted an internal investigation into allegations of foreign corruption for a multinational corporation
-
Way v. Schembri, 2025 ONSC 946
Successful on a motion to dismiss an action and strike a defence after the responding party failed to comply with court orders, including a peremptory order, to produce relevant documents.